FINISH LINE Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Frequent Occurrences of Major Earthquakes

Question: The most straightforward approach to characterize the flexibility is as far as relocations, as the greatest uprooting partitioned with the removal during the main yield. Answer: Eurocode 8 purposes to guarantee life wellbeing alongside harm limitation that can be brought about by visit events of serious quakes. Measures set down permit dissemination of seismic powers either through flexible damping or versatile conduct, with inclination towards the main procedure. Flexibility is the capacity of a structure and its parts to oppose harm through outrageous yet viable disfigurements and in seismic building, articulation of malleability is done through pliability request, a term used to characterize most extreme malleability a structure can accomplish and by accessible malleability, that is the greatest zero harm twisting a structure can continue. Along these lines, making of a steady and solid vitality retention framework that has no effect on any basic inertial burden bearing part is the objective of the norm and rules have been set down for such malleability model structures that dont repress stacking. For fortified solid structures, defer circles can decrease limit of such basic zones and guarantee plastic conduct and proficient planning rules can forestall decimation related with fragile basic disappointments like solid shearing, pounding and support twisting. Three degrees of vitality retention are adjusted:- Low Class Ductility with no postponed malleable properties and the structures limit opposes seismic powers. Medium Class Ductility with high bendable levels that have adaptable plans and structure necessities. High Ductility Class characterized by high flexibility levels and have exacting and complex plans and structure necessities. Low Ductility Class gauges seismic stacking plan of auxiliary individuals through structure seismic activities with conduct factor of q=1.5 and fortification computations for ordinary circumstances though with some material constraints like least solid nature of c16/20. . EC8 proposals manage DCL plan confinements; these are appropriate just for low seismic movement areas with ground quickening of 0.10g and less. Regions with high movement ought not have DCL structured structures as it would be cataclysmic from a wellbeing and money related perspective. For higher flexibility classes, the standard sets down plans of a steady and secure seismic vitality assimilation model in listed basic territories of structure and these models are to have a conduct factor of more than 1.5. There are clear contrasts between the two higher classes of flexibility, if there should be an occurrence of, the steel strain and related geometrical and material limitations.; distinction in components of configuration stacking impacts ; lastly, various guidelines of plan for limit and nearby pliability level. The conduct factor of the distinctive malleability classes can be differed concerning the varieties in the level bearings of a specific structure, independent of the reality of pliability being equivalent and same every which way of the structure. The higher two classes of flexibility are very comparable and proportional as far as basic execution during any sort of seismic activity and action that influences the structures plan. It is very simple and easy to achieve and execute a medium class malleability plan at a moment and this sort of configuration yields better outcome in instances of medium level seismic movement. The higher class flexibility plans are considered to have the option to give more prominent and better degrees of wellbeing y and protection from instance of restricted or all out and complete breakdown of a specific structure during the event of serious quakes of high Richter scale greatness that surpasses the hypothetical burden bearing yield purpose of the basic components. Eurocode 8 gauges don't interface or relate the similar decisions between the two flexibility classes with any sort of seismic movement and activity around there or area, nor is any association or connection made as for the structures sig nificance and importance and doesn't set any sort of cutoff at all in regards to the use of these two classes of malleability. The state individuals are the ones who have been given organizing power with respect to the meaning of utilization in various zones and the different sorts of structures where these two classes can and ought to be utilized. It ought to be guaranteed that if the plan powers counts are done as per the pliable responsive interest, at that point the structure must flop in a pliable and controlled manner; this thought is the essential main thrust behind limit planning. Substance of limit structuring can be set down in a couple of focuses:- Plastic pivots ought to be fixed on pillars not segments. Thick steel stirrups to be utilized for satisfactory hear fortification Steel individuals ought to bomb away from any purposes of associations. Extensive auxiliary abnormalities ought to be kept away from Malleable limit must surpass shear limit

How (and Why) to Live On Last Months Income

How (and Why) to Live On Last Months Income How (and Why) to Live On Last Months Income How (and Why) to Live On Last Months IncomeInstead of spending that fresh new paycheck right away, plan ahead and build yourself a financial buffer…If you’re living paycheck to paycheck, it can feel like you’re Tarzan swinging through the jungle. Every time you reach the end of one vine, you reach out and grab another. But what happens if you go to reach for a vine and there’s nothing there? Well, the answer is you probably end up plummeting down to the jungle floor. Ouch. (And gross. Jungle floors are gross.)Living from one paycheck to another leaves you without any kind of safety net. If you lose your job or have an unexpected expense, you’ll have to start piling on debt in order to keep going. But what if you had enough money in the bank that you weren’t living paycheck to paycheck? What if you were living a few paychecks ahead? This is called living on last month’s income. And it’s a great way to start giving your finances some much-needed stability.PLAN, SAVE AND PLAN AGAINThe first step is to make a monthly budget. This is one of those things that feels daunting until you actually get started. Once you sit down and map out how much income you receive each month and what your regular expenses are, you’ll feel better because you can literally see your needs and plan for them ahead of time.Now that you’ve made a budget, you can start proactively saving (read more in How to Avoid a Payday Loan: Savings Strategies). You’ll know exactly how much you need to save in order to cover a month’s worth of expenses. If your monthly expenses total $3,000 and you are able to save $700 a month, then it would take three months for you to save up. Plus, in that scenario, you’d have $100 left over. Why don’t you treat yourself by blowing that $100 on…your credit card bill?Now that you’ve saved enough money to cover a month’s expenses, wait until the next month and then use that money to cover that month’s expenses. It’s really pretty sim ple. Every paycheck you receive that month will go straight to the bank and remain untouched until the following month. From now on, you’ll always have a one-month buffer between the money you are earning and the money you are spending. It will also help you stay within your budget.WHAT’S NEXT?Congratulations, you are living on last month’s income. So, is that it? Nope! Now that you are practicing fiscal responsibility, it’s the perfect time to practice even more of it.Make sure that your budget includes saving additional money every month and start building an emergency fund, preferably at least six months worth of expenses. Make a plan for paying down your debt and look at the possibilities for a debt consolidation loan. And if you have less-than-perfect credit, check out our website, www.opploans.com. We offer installment loans with great rates and affordable monthly payments.

Argumentative Essay On Human Euthanasia - 1433 Words

Human Euthanasia It is a shared understanding that human life must be valued under any circumstance, and it should not be terminated for whatever reasons unless it is a natural occurrence. The value and respect for human life were behind the debate against â€Å"the death row† in many states and countries around the world. In addition, religion places high value in human life, basing on the claim that it is a sin to end one’s life. However, there have been instances where ending the life of another person is the best alternative, especially in medical cases. The idea brought the emergence of euthanasia, where Math and Chaturvedi (2012) explain it as a Greek word that means â€Å"good death.† The purpose of good death is to assist a patient who will†¦show more content†¦Math and Chaturvedi (2012) observe that a common claim on euthanasia is the idea that most patients with chronic illnesses do not want to be a burden to their loved ones. In such instances, the patients co me to consider it as the best alternative. It is regarded as an honor to the â€Å"right of living† through accepting the â€Å"right to die† (Math Chartuvedi, 2012). A CNN report by Ben Tinker claims that in the state of California, one hundred and eleven people died under the right to die law. According to Tinker (2017), the End of Life Option Act took effect on 9th June 2016. It provided that individuals starting from the age of eighteen had the right to request medication that was life-ending from their doctors. The circumstances of such requests were only when the patient was suffering from a terminal illness, and they decided to have a death timetable. As Tinker (2017) reports, the Act enabled two hundred and fifty-eight persons to initiate the process. Such significant figures indicate that people find it okay to end their lives rather than suffer in the struggle to remain alive. It is argued that in doing so, the people preserve their dignity and may even die a â€Å"happy death†, as they know they had to choose how they died. BBC (2014) presented arguments against euthanasia and classified it as ethical, practical, and religious. The moral argument was based on the sanctity of life. It presented that by allowing the society to practice euthanasia, it was an approach toShow MoreRelatedShould Euthanasia Be Legalized?977 Words   |  4 PagesArgumentative Essay: Euthanasia Euthanasia is acknowledged as the practice of intentionally ending a life which liberates an individual from an incurable illness or unbearable misery. Euthanasia is known as mercy killing, perceived as an easy and painless death. Euthanasia is done from the request of a dying patient or that person’s legal representative. This is known as Voluntary Euthanasia. Not undertaking something to prevent or avoid someone’s death is recognised as passive or negative EuthanasiaRead MoreArgumentative Essay : Killing And Letting Die1401 Words   |  6 PagesArgumentative Essay # 1: Killing and Letting Die According to James Rachels in his highly acclaimed article The End of Life, Rachels argues that killing and letting die are morally equivalent. My objective within this essay is to highlight and illuminate Rachel’s key points within the The End of Life, which leads him to this particular conclusion. While doing so I will highlight the main objection to Rachels argument, and illuminate my own objections to further prove that Rachels position isRead MoreEssay on Euthanasia Needs to be a Legal Option1376 Words   |  6 PagesEuthanasia Needs to be a Legal Option    Warren Hauser is dying. Should the Supreme Court decide that terminally ill Americans have a constitutional right to commit suicide with a doctors help, he would qualify. Emphysema and valvular heart disease have left him debilitated and physically dependent (Byock). For terminally ill patients like Warren, where death is inevitable and would be less painful than living, euthanasia should be a legal option. Euthanasia is Greek for easy or happy deathRead MoreContemporary Moral Issue Essay2709 Words   |  11 Pages philosophical essays, and book excerpts, all of which will be posted on Blackboard (http://blackboard.wm.edu). Goals of the Course: By taking Contemporary Moral Issues, students will: learn how to read difficult philosophical texts and gain an understanding and appreciation of important arguments in the field; learn how to express their thoughts in writing clearly and concisely (students will have the opportunity to attain this goal through response papers, quizzes and essays); learn how toRead MoreWork: Scientific Method and Exploratory Research1888 Words   |  8 Pages  Shields  and Tajalli link exploratory research with the  conceptual framework  working hypothesis.[3] Skeptics, however, have questioned the usefulness and necessity of exploratory research in situations where prior analysis could be conducted instead. Argumentative topics †¢ Abortion – is it the best method for unwanted pregnancies. †¢ Plastic surgery – is it really necessary? And is it safe? †¢ Smoking Should be Banned †¢ The internet – the best thing since the invention of the television. †¢ Breast feedingRead MoreFor Against by L.G. Alexander31987 Words   |  128 PagesBy the same author SIXTY STEPS TO PRECIS POETRY AND PROSE APPRECIATION ESSAY AND LEITER ·WRITING A FIRST BOOK IN COMPREHENSION PRECIS AND COMPOSITION ras CARTERS OF GREENWOOD (Cineloops) DETECTIVES FROM SCOTLAND YARD (Longman Structural Readers, Stage 1) CAR THIEVES [Longman Structural Readers, Stage 1) WORTH A FORTUNE [Longman Structural Readers, Stage 2) APRIL FOOLS DAY [Longman Structural Readers, Stage 2) PROFESSOR BOFFIN S UMBRELLA (Longman Structural Readers, Stage 2) OPERATION MASfERMIND

Defending Utilitarianism- Mills Answer - 1163 Words

Defending Utilitarianism: Mill’s posthumous answer to Nozick’s experience machine â€Å"The greatest good for the greatest number†; that is how the British philosopher John Stuart Mill famously summarized utilitarianism (Shafer-Landau, 2012b, p. 120). He is not only one of the greatest utilitarians, he is also a hedonist. Hence, he believed that this greatest good can be achieved by focussing all action on attaining the greatest amount of happiness. Mill describes utility as holding ‘that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness’ ((Shafer-Landau, 2012a, p. 17). He defines happiness as pleasure and the absence of pain, and unhappiness as pain and the privation of pleasure. Hence, Mill argues that only pleasure is intrinsically desirable and only misery intrinsically bad (Shafer-Landau, 2012a, p. 120). All other desirable things are only desirable as means to promote pleasure or prevent pain (Shafer-Landau, 2012a, p. 18). Therefore, in order to refute Mill’s u tilitarianism, one would have to show that there is something other than pleasure or the freedom from pain that is intrinsically desirable. First, Robert Nozick’s attempt to disprove utilitarianism and hedonism in the shape of his ‘experience machine’ will be explained. Next, Mill’s arguments in favour of utilitarianism and hedonism will be recapitulated in an attempt to answer the central research question: why does Nozick’s experienceShow MoreRelatedThe Age Of Reason Or Known As The Enlightenment1189 Words   |  5 Pageswell known English-speaking, British Philosopher. Mill grew up well educated by his father, James Mill, who taught him Greek and Latin, in which her fully excelled. He also studied logics, mathematics, and mastered the basics of the economic theory. Mill’s strenuous academic studies came from his father’s plan to make, â€Å" †¦ a young proponent of the views of the philosophical (bio.com).† However, in the late 1820s Mill suffered a severe mental crisis. This was due to the intense educational work loadRead MoreJohn Stuart Mill ´s The Greatest Happiness Principle Essay906 Words   |  4 PagesI will be explaining John Stuart Mill’s view on ethics. This includes explaining the â€Å"Greatest Happiness Principle†, happiness, unhappiness, quality of pleasure, lying, and the relevance of time with his view. I will then explain how I agree with the principle of Rule Utilitarianism. I will also consider the objection of conflicting rules in Rule Utilitarianism as well as that of negative responsibility, giving my response to each. Mill claims that morals find their root in Utility, otherwise calledRead MoreThe Dilemma Of The Death Penalty1703 Words   |  7 PagesThere are many ethical issues that beset our society in this day and age. This paper will discuss the ethological dilemma of the death penalty in the philosophical outlooks of Utilitarianism and Deontology, present arguments in light of both, and proceed to show why Deontology offers the best insights into the justification for the death penalty. The death penalty, also known as â€Å"capital punishment†, is, â€Å"the sentence of execution for murder and some other capital crimes (serious crimes, especiallyRead More John Stuart Mill on Individual Liberty Essay2353 Words   |  10 Pagescurrent moral sentiments of society, and finally, iii) welfare considerations, i.e. relating to restricting of an individuals liberty for the good of others. In other words, Mills individual liberty is as such: unless ones actions have injurious repercussions, one has the individual liberty to act as he wishes. Mills principle sought to guarantee a sphere of self-regarding action that is inviolable, and exempt from social control, where individuals could experiment different ways of living evenRead MoreThe Ethical Dilemma Of The Death Penalty1814 Words   |  8 Pagesa Utilitarianist and a Deontologist Viewpoint There are many ethical issues that beset our society in this day and age. This paper will discuss the ethological dilemma of the death penalty from the perspective of the philosophical outlooks of Utilitarianism and Deontology, present arguments in light of both, and proceed to show why Deontology offers the best insights into the justification for the death penalty. The death penalty, also known as â€Å"capital punishment†, is, â€Å"the sentence of executionRead MoreJurisprudential Theories on IPR13115 Words   |  53 Pagesof self. But it was also because he thought the productivity of labor would help answer some of the difficulties which he saw in First Occupancy theory. Though the first occupier does not actually dispossess anyone, still his acquisition may prejudice others interests of others if there is not, in Lockes words, ‘enough and as good left in common’ for them to enjoy (Locke 1988 [1689], II, para. 27). Lockes answer to this difficulty was to emphasize that appropriation by  productive  labor actuallyRead MoreHerbert Spencer Essay13142 Words   |  53 PagesSpencer himself was never religious, and he enjoyed setting out for Sunday rambles walking provocatively in the opposite direction to the churchgoers. But unconsciously, the agnostic mid-Victorians searched for some other system of thought which cou ld answer their doubts and give them clear first principles. Science was one alternative which was widely seized on, hence the battles over evolution and religion. Evolution offered, it seemed, an alternative conceptual framework, universally operating laws

Burning a Nation’s Flag Hate Crime Free Essays

Burning a nation’s flag: Hate Crime or Free Speech? A nation’s flag is one of the most important things to a country. Citizens of a nation use it during special ceremonies, and a nation’s flag is displayed all over that nation. A flag is an emblem shown as a symbol of unity. We will write a custom essay sample on Burning a Nation’s Flag: Hate Crime or any similar topic only for you Order Now It symbolizes the pride and history of a nation. So what does burning a nation’s flag mean? Is it considered a hate crime and illegal, or is it considered an act of free speech and protected by the First Amendment? For the purposes of this argument, a hate crime is defined as a crime motivated by racial, sexual, or other prejudice, typically one involving violence (What Are Hate Crimes? ). I believe that burning a nation’s flag is not a hate crime due to the fact that burning a nation’s flag falls under a category that is protected by the First Amendment. In a hate crime, the targeted group could be categorized by not just race or sexuality, but religion and political beliefs or group as well. By burning a nation’s flag, we could easily categorize it as targeting a political group. When a person burns a nation’s flag, he/she could be targeting the general people of that nation, the government of that nation, or to be even more specific, the leaders of that government. . In this case, we will say that the political group referred to is the government(to be more specific, the American government). Therefore, by burning a nation’s flag, someone disagrees and takes a stand against a political activity or decision. In contrast to what a hate crime is, an act of free speech, protected by the First Amendment, is the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint. An act of free speech does not necessarily mean saying something out loud. It could also mean expressing your opinions about something by using actions. Since burning a nation’s flag suggests taking a stand against a political activity, it is a way of expressing your opinion. Similar to free speech, freedom of expression which is part of the Human Rights Act says that you have the right to hold your own opinions and to express them freely without government interference (Equality and Human Rights Commission). The government cannot arrest you or punish you for burning a nation’s flag as long as no one gets physically hurt. Just like in almost every country around the world, America has its own Flag Code. The Flag Code is a guide for all handling and display of the Stars and Stripes, but it does not impose penalties for misuse of the United States flag (US code 36). Each state has its own flag law, and penalty for misuse of the flag is up to the state. Criminal penalties for certain acts of vandalism of a flag were stated in Title 18 of the United States Code prior to 1989. The Supreme Court decision in Texas v. Johnson held the statute unconstitutional, though. In Texas v. Johnson, respondent Gregory Lee â€Å"Joey† Johnson was convicted of an act of disrespect of a venerated object, which violates a Texas statute. During the 1984 Republican National Convention, Johnson protested the policies of the Reagan administration and Dallas-based corporation. During the protest, Johnson burned the American flag. No one was physically hurt or injured, but some witnesses felt severely offended by this. However, due to the First Amendment, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals decided that the State could not punish Johnson for burning the flag in these circumstances. In addition, the Texas statute states that it is only illegal to burn a nation’s flag when the act would result in a serious disturbance of peace. However, the flag burning in this case did not threaten such a reaction (Texas v. Johnson. ). It is true that showing your anger towards the government can be expressed in other ways besides burning the nation’s flag. One could protest, write a book, or write a blog to take a stand against a political action. However, no matter which of these actions you decide to do, you are still doing it to achieve the same goal: express your opinion and make a change in the government. Citation Page â€Å"Texas v. Johnson. †Ã‚  Cornell University Law School. 21 Mar. 1989. Online. 12 Feb. 2013. ;http://www. law. cornell. edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0491_0397_ZS. html;. â€Å"What Are Hate Crimes? †Ã‚  SikhNet. Online. 12 Feb. 2013. ;http://fateh. sikhnet. com/s/HateCrimeInfo;. â€Å"Article 485†Ã‚  New York Laws. Online. 12 Feb. 2013. How to cite Burning a Nation’s Flag: Hate Crime, Essay examples

Jane Eyre - Analysis Of Nature Essays - English-language Films

Jane Eyre - Analysis of Nature Charlotte Bronte makes use of nature imagery throughout "Jane Eyre," and comments on both the human relationship with the outdoors and human nature. The Oxford Reference Dictionary defines "nature" as "1. the phenomena of the physical world as a whole . . . 2. a thing's essential qualities; a person's or animal's innate character . . . 4. vital force, functions, or needs." We will see how "Jane Eyre" comments on all of these. Several natural themes run through the novel, one of which is the image of a stormy sea. After Jane saves Rochester's life, she gives us the following metaphor of their relationship: "Till morning dawned I was tossed on a buoyant but unquiet sea . . . I thought sometimes I saw beyond its wild waters a shore . . . now and then a freshening gale, wakened by hope, bore my spirit triumphantly towards the bourne: but . . . a counteracting breeze blew off land, and continually drove me back." The gale is all the forces that prevent Jane's union with Rochester. Later, Bront?, whether it be intentional or not, conjures up the image of a buoyant sea when Rochester says of Jane: "Your habitual expression in those days, Jane, was . . . not buoyant." In fact, it is this buoyancy of Jane's relationship with Rochester that keeps Jane afloat at her time of crisis in the heath: "Why do I struggle to retain a valueless life? Because I know, or believe, Mr. Rochester is living." Another recurrent image is Bront?'s treatment of Birds. We first witness Jane's fascination when she reads Bewick's History of British Birds as a child. She reads of "death-white realms" and "'the solitary rocks and promontories'" of sea-fowl. We quickly see how Jane identifies with the bird. For her it is a form of escape, the idea of flying above the toils of every day life. Several times the narrator talks of feeding birds crumbs. Perhaps Bront? is telling us that this idea of escape is no more than a fantasy-one cannot escape when one must return for basic sustenance. The link between Jane and birds is strengthened by the way Bront? adumbrates poor nutrition at Lowood through a bird who is described as "a little hungry robin." Bront? brings the buoyant sea theme and the bird theme together in the passage describing the first painting of Jane's that Rochester examines. This painting depicts a turbulent sea with a sunken ship, and on the mast perches a cormorant with a gold bracelet in its mouth, apparently taken from a drowning body. While the imagery is perhaps too imprecise to afford an exact interpretation, a possible explanation can be derived from the context of previous treatments of these themes. The sea is surely a metaphor for Rochester and Jane's relationship, as we have already seen. Rochester is often described as a "dark" and dangerous man, which fits the likeness of a cormorant; it is therefore likely that Bront? sees him as the sea bird. As we shall see later, Jane goes through a sort of symbolic death, so it makes sense for her to represent the drowned corpse. The gold bracelet can be the purity and innocence of the old Jane that Rochester managed to capture before she left him. Having established some of the nature themes in "Jane Eyre," we can now look at the natural cornerstone of the novel: the passage between her flight from Thornfield and her acceptance into Morton. In leaving Thornfield, Jane has severed all her connections; she has cut through any umbilical cord. She narrates: "Not a tie holds me to human society at this moment." After only taking a small parcel with her from Thornfield, she leaves even that in the coach she rents. Gone are all references to Rochester, or even her past life. A "sensible" heroine might have gone to find her uncle, but Jane needed to leave her old life behind. Jane is seeking a return to the womb of mother nature: "I have no relative but the universal mother, Nature: I will seek her breast and ask repose." We see how she seeks protection as she searches for a resting place: "I struck